Saturday, March 31, 2007

Obsessive middle class hypocrisy

If anybody with an educative and inquisitive mind goes through Indian history and philosophy, the self proclaimed 'wow' factor would be clearly visible. An age old mountain of traditional burdens, a closed society with unknown fear of unseen future and the incapability to accept the inevitable have been the hallmark of this so called great country and civilization. Indians take pride in their history, culture and what not. Anything and everything which is nostalgic has to have an Indian touch and if something is not praiseworthy it could never have an Indian link. My only question remains - whom are we fooling?
I have dwelt at length in one of my past blog about the double standards present in the Indian mythology and history. We always preach "Adwaita" and believe in twin theories. We have created 33 crores of deities and have told the world that everyone is same. Back home, we were the proponent of casteism and division of labor theory based on social rank. Sudras could not be equalled with Brahmans and they had a different set of deities to pray. Yet we proudly announced the supremacy of our bramhinical knowledge. To have such an open policy of flexible rule only shows our eagerness to maintain the status quo.
We projected women as source of power and used all kinds of heinous crimes to suppress them. We told god is neutral and clarified that he had to do certain things for safeguarding his favorite protege. Our roots have been in deep shambles of fractured verdict though we speak of unified language.
Politics, the next populist brickbat is another prime example. We have all types of political ideologies flowing like rivers and in the back office of power while they are talking of national project of river integration. Here, the left is more right than their opposition and the ruling capitalists fear more of the working class for votes. The rules at center and state are different for the same political party, the economics mean something to prime minister and something else to his cabinet, while the executives are a bunch of hypocrites saved only to follow the lords.
This leaves only citizens to be fair. To my best knowledge, I have never come across anyone (including yours truly) who is fair, justified and rational. A south indian hates north indians in Bangalore but couldn't do without them in Gurgaon. East always believed that they were the unluckiest lot post independence, but never thinks of improving them on their own. Everybody wants industry, but exactly only at those locations where they think would best suit them. Indians say that materialistic world is to be denounced yet when it comes to decide social status money remains the sole deciding criteria. We are ready to discuss what Buddha or Christ did wrong but are not open for discussion about retrogressive hindu laws. We think politics couldn't be in isolation to religion but are opposed to theory if the religion is not Hinduism. We easily criticise Bill Clinton but shudder to even think about such things regarding some of our dear national leaders.
The time has come for the referendum. For the people to think and think from their heart. To come out openly and unequivocally about what they want. If they want a progressive country then north and south has to speak the same language, west has to embrace the qualities from east. We cannot remain indecisive and ask for a decisive verdict from the political class. After all they are only the public manifestation of the society at large.
A decision about whether we need a rule or prefer anarchy to suit our individual needs is the call of the hour.

Labels:

7 Comments:

At 8:08 PM , Blogger spiderman! said...

This response itself will qualify as a post:

Casteism and the division of labour
theory is by and large a very archaic concept of something which are called "core competency" nowadays. Unfortunately, sages in ancient times did not have a MBA degree to fall back on, so they came up with this system where there would be peaceful co-existence of all based on a purely value-creation environment where all parts of a machine would have a critical task to perform for the greater good of the society. Often times, beautiful concepts or
philosophies go haywire because of poor implementation or because they are against the basic tenet or nature of human beings - that of freedom of choice. It can be argued and not without merit that the concept of 'freedom' was never as explicit then as it is now or as it was till a thousand years back. The problem with casteism began when brahmins, aware of their superior position due to access to education started manipulating everything to suit themselves. Like communism, casteism gave way to parochialism of the worst kind and brahminism came to be associated with all things oppressive in later years.


The Left is seldom right. In fact, I cannot remember a time when they were so. I am not much of an admirer for the River Integration project since I think it is best not to tinker around with nature after a point of time - nature has a cruel way of hitting back. A thousand years later, when civilization would cease to exist and a thousand years from then on, if it were to be rediscovered and India's political history is to be found, the epitaph of CPIM as a party would read "A secular anti-Hindu, political party based on ideology of benefit to the poor,
without an ideology, designed to think for the poor but keep them there, which ruled and screwed one of the most prosperous states of India alleged to indulge in anti-national activities at a time of extreme crisis"


I do agree, that we are hypocrites.
That we are always in a state of denial and are bitten by the "holier-than-thou" bug (vide political class' reluctance to introduce sex education and AIDS awareness from standard 6 on the pretext of safeguarding Indian culture !!


Unfortuantely, we have become what we never aspired to become. Or worse still, what we never thought we would become - a closed, narcissistic, retrograde, superstitious, unscrupulous society neither without the wisdom we are proud of nor the tolerance which once defined our identity.

 
At 8:10 PM , Blogger Gaurav Kumar Ambasta said...

"...We always preach "Adwaita" and believe in twin theories..."

Advaita is to be realised, not merely to be believed.... for average people only dualist theory is given... Shankaracharya realised this more than anyone else.... hence the four matths.. In any case dualism and advaita is looking at same thing from different standpoints...which makes dualism true and not false.. hence the twin theories do exist..

"...We have created 33 crores of deities and have told the world that everyone is same. ..."

don't see any hypocracy here..

"...Back home, we were the proponent of casteism and division of labor theory based on social rank...."

All societies get divided into classes... It is inevitable... leave a bunch of people on an island and classes would emerge...

"...Sudras could not be equalled with Brahmans and they had a different set of deities to pray...."

I don't know which deity is forbidden for Shudra... Ours is a philosphy that preaches oneness of existance... however, society develops ills that needed to be weeded out time and again... that correction is being done to caste system...

"...Yet we proudly announced the supremacy of our bramhinical knowledge..."

again..no hypocracy..

"....We projected women as source of power and used all kinds of heinous crimes to suppress them....."

Completely agree with u on this one..

"...We told god is neutral and clarified that he had to do certain things for safeguarding his favorite protege..."

But u r also free to decide whatever concept of God u want to build... same place also have piles of books on "nirgun Brahman"

"...Our roots have been in deep shambles of fractured verdict though we speak of unified language...."

A perception that needs to be changed..

"The rules at center and state are different for the same political party.."

absolutely...spot on..

"...A south indian hates north indians in Bangalore but couldn't do without them in Gurgaon.."

With more people venturing into other states..this would change..

"...Indians say that materialistic world is to be denounced yet when it comes to decide social status money remains the sole deciding criteria...."

Materialistic world should be denounced is philosophically... while money decides status is not a theorised philosophy... at best u can call it non-conformance to ideal...ideal was never that,,

"...We are ready to discuss what Buddha or Christ did wrong but are not open for discussion about retrogressive hindu laws..."

Completely disagree.. Manusmriti is not the guiding force behind our constitution... and yes... there is a tradition of criticism in religious development in India which is unmatched elsewhere..

"...We think politics couldn't be in isolation to religion but are opposed to theory if the religion is not Hinduism.."

Quite the opposite.. In India opposed to theory if it is Hinduism..

"..If they want a progressive country then north and south has to speak the same language, west has to embrace the qualities from east...."

How can that happen if day & night we harp on differences in the name of Pluralism... Do we have the courage to accept what the single most unifying factor of India is ??

Until we believe on the commonalities that we have... north or south is a product of our one culture... called Hindutva or bhartiayata or whatever u call it.. u cannot end the differences..

 
At 1:09 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

@ spiderman....

If a post generates more prints in criticism than actual writing then what does that qualify for? A masterpiece or a rubbish?

I have no objection in division of labor..Infact I support it to a certain extent. But my contention was why divide the society on the basis of labor? Why look down on a certain section just because they happened to do some shitty work? By that logic all IT employees would qualify as Sudras. Remember the last night funda of Wisdom being easily available?

When I said "left is right" I didn't use the word "right" in the meaning what u thought. I guess right has another meaning also other than being correct. :)..The question of left being right never arises as I have proven that their basic ideology is dommed to fail. Its only the fairytale ideological thinking which is so alluring. And FYI, I hate CPI(M) more than even the BJP - not only because they destroyed WB but they became the mouthpiece of communist ideals which they never were.


@ GKA...
Pehele to aapki sukriya aada karna chahiye kyun ki aapka komments mere blog se behetar hain..Next comes by useless defence.

I have no problem in twin theories, or infact 100 theories as long as they serve the same purpose. But, somewhere in the midst of ideological presentation of proxy standpoints we have lost the essence of the core. Now we have only concentric circles without any radial path, so we have no connection to reach the center.

Next two points were not meant to show what they are thought. 33 crore is a huge number and good enough to mislead an ordinary person with little or no education.

With class vide what I have said to spiderman. No objection to superficial division but seldom that happens when you create concrete boundaries based on cast and untouchability.
Bramhinical knowledge is good if it is used in academics only. But this is only my judgement hence subject to being wrong.

The concept of Shakta and Baishnabs are probably because of the class division. If I am not wrong, godess Manasa was not being worshipped by bramhins. Vide source - Any publication on history and culture of Bengali literature and Bengal.

I am not very clear about Hindutwa or bharatiwatya. For me country comes first anyway and I would prefer the second nomenclature than the first.

But, to the best of my knowledge I again admit that the responses are better than the original post and I think blog is not a bad idea to enrich my little useless brain.

 
At 3:12 PM , Blogger Gaurav Kumar Ambasta said...

"..Now we have only concentric circles without any radial path, so we have no connection to reach the center..."

Dualism and Monism as told by the sages are but logical stages of the "process". I see this philosophy as a source of great knowledge. I don't know why u think it is hypocracy.

"...33 crore is a huge number and good enough to mislead an ordinary person with little or no education...."

I have never come across people who say they are confused as there are too many Gods in Hinduism.. Normally people don't even know more than 4-5 gods that they worship.. Again I fail to see hypocracy here.

"...If I am not wrong,godess Manasa was not being worshipped by bramhins...."

After so much of thought u came up with one Goddess name... that too u r not sure... It just shows that such a practice is not rampant...Also the only example shows the goddess is forbidden for Brahmins and not Shudras..

"....I am not very clear about Hindutwa or bharatiwatya.... "

That is a commonality.... that whatever faith/language/region we take.... our ancestory is common..
and that ancestory is steeped in sanatan dharma... I know it is politically incorrect to take such a stand.. Give me one more reason as to why India is one.. U cannot say that everyone is different and still expect all to live together,,, That theory on pluralism has caused so much damage to the idea of India..

 
At 3:55 AM , Blogger spiderman! said...

It qualifies neither as a masterpiece nor as rubbish ! It just goes on to proves that the reader does not agree with you and is provoked to shoot off a response. In that sense, the creation is definitely worth - since it evokes a feeling and not of indifference.

Yep, sorry, apologies for the 'right' statement !

I agree that even if someone does some work which is not exactly strategic or worthwhile according to us, there is no reason to look down upon them. As long as you are true to the work you are doing, it does not matter what you do. And that did not happen because Brahminical tyranny took over. But that came at a later stage. They were not the basis of formation of caste - as much as I despise the system.

 
At 2:36 PM , Blogger SRK said...

Agree on the 'middle class hypocrisy'... disagree on the 'Indian' part...

don't we know of British system of Lords, Dukes, peasants etc, again based on labour... a person born as a peasant doesn't become a Lord... and that country has a freeloading monarchy even today, long after India wiped out all 'princes' and 'kings'...

don't we know of South African 'apartheid' or the American history on Slavery? wasn't that based on race and labour?

as for the Gods, irrespetive of whether u have 1 prophet, 1 Son of the Living God or 33 crore deities, the only bad thing is when u proclaim that mine is the only true God... and we know that the West does that more than us...

The West also wants the Third World consumer access without opening their own markets... isn't agricultural subsidy there a hypocrisy when they talk of free trade in the WTO?

Isn't bombing countries hypocrisy when they preach against terrorism? Isn't rejecting goods made by child labour hypocrisy when u employ sweatshop workers in Vietnam??

Isn't preaching nuclear non-proliferation hypocrisy when u have the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons???

So, why single out India and Indians? Every society is hypocritical... it is basic human nature to ask more for oneself and set different standards for others... it is nuthin but primal animal instinct of survival that you will try to have the best for yourself and set different rules for others... and if you say that we Indians have remained animals and have not risen with 'human consciousness', show me any other society which has...

 
At 2:41 PM , Blogger SRK said...

and oops, before I forget, what about the Chinese? Communist state with more freedom to the Western Capitalists than even India...

:D

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home